<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Woefully Inadequate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thinktoomuch.net/2007/10/26/woefully-inadequate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thinktoomuch.net/2007/10/26/woefully-inadequate/</link>
	<description>Pondering the South African Memesphere - Looking for the Good in Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 15:43:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugo</title>
		<link>http://www.thinktoomuch.net/2007/10/26/woefully-inadequate/#comment-2377</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 21:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinktoomuch.net/2007/10/26/woefully-inadequate/#comment-2377</guid>
		<description>For an hour or two just now, I lost my focus. Reading own blog helped get me back on track. I did realise what a monumental task this will be, though. I must re-focus on the important stuff, namely, relationships.

The most I can do is plant some seeds and water the ground. Whether anything grows, depends on the soil. I really should not have huge expectations, but the domino effect is bigger than one thinks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For an hour or two just now, I lost my focus. Reading own blog helped get me back on track. I did realise what a monumental task this will be, though. I must re-focus on the important stuff, namely, relationships.</p>
<p>The most I can do is plant some seeds and water the ground. Whether anything grows, depends on the soil. I really should not have huge expectations, but the domino effect is bigger than one thinks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Negate</title>
		<link>http://www.thinktoomuch.net/2007/10/26/woefully-inadequate/#comment-2364</link>
		<dc:creator>Negate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 20:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinktoomuch.net/2007/10/26/woefully-inadequate/#comment-2364</guid>
		<description>- &quot;What are you so scared of? I am not trying to convert anyone to any religion. I seek merely to explain, I seek merely to promote a better understanding of all sides, from all sides. And it is damn difficult, purely because people are not interested in hearing.&quot;

Atheism and religion are not simply two sides of the same coin that you can connect with a bridge.

You can achieve a state where atheist have more tolerance for religious people and vise verse

You will never evoke understanding of these two subjects from both sides. It is impossible, for the simple a reason. Either side has to submit to discarding fundamental ideas of life before they can truly see another point of view (submition of core ideas don&#039;t go easy) Humans just don’t change very quickly about core issue 

A Forest has different shapes, sizes and type of trees. Put together they do make a forest of trees, but then you missed the point :-)

You are taking on a instrumental task Hugo, that will break or make you. Maybe you should look at simultaneous multiple approaches to your problem(to many damn trees in the forest you know)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- &#8220;What are you so scared of? I am not trying to convert anyone to any religion. I seek merely to explain, I seek merely to promote a better understanding of all sides, from all sides. And it is damn difficult, purely because people are not interested in hearing.&#8221;</p>
<p>Atheism and religion are not simply two sides of the same coin that you can connect with a bridge.</p>
<p>You can achieve a state where atheist have more tolerance for religious people and vise verse</p>
<p>You will never evoke understanding of these two subjects from both sides. It is impossible, for the simple a reason. Either side has to submit to discarding fundamental ideas of life before they can truly see another point of view (submition of core ideas don&#8217;t go easy) Humans just don’t change very quickly about core issue </p>
<p>A Forest has different shapes, sizes and type of trees. Put together they do make a forest of trees, but then you missed the point <img src='http://www.thinktoomuch.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>You are taking on a instrumental task Hugo, that will break or make you. Maybe you should look at simultaneous multiple approaches to your problem(to many damn trees in the forest you know)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugo</title>
		<link>http://www.thinktoomuch.net/2007/10/26/woefully-inadequate/#comment-2256</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinktoomuch.net/2007/10/26/woefully-inadequate/#comment-2256</guid>
		<description>Actually, no... I would love it if you reply to the previous post, &quot;Dear Freethinking Maties&quot;, immediately. Any and all questions are welcome.

Commenters that assume I&#039;m stupid, might be doing themselves a disfavour... I&#039;d suggest they keep open the possibility that I might actually mean what I say and have a perfectly rational and sensible reason for saying it. Even if it seems a little mad.

What is the difference between slightly mad (as in &quot;mad scientist&quot; mad), and deluded? I suspect the difference is subtle but significant...

(For example: &lt;em&gt;my&lt;/em&gt; impression, is that bluegrey is underestimating me. Of course, that doesn&#039;t necessarily mean he &lt;em&gt;is&lt;/em&gt; underestimating me.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, no&#8230; I would love it if you reply to the previous post, &#8220;Dear Freethinking Maties&#8221;, immediately. Any and all questions are welcome.</p>
<p>Commenters that assume I&#8217;m stupid, might be doing themselves a disfavour&#8230; I&#8217;d suggest they keep open the possibility that I might actually mean what I say and have a perfectly rational and sensible reason for saying it. Even if it seems a little mad.</p>
<p>What is the difference between slightly mad (as in &#8220;mad scientist&#8221; mad), and deluded? I suspect the difference is subtle but significant&#8230;</p>
<p>(For example: <em>my</em> impression, is that bluegrey is underestimating me. Of course, that doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean he <em>is</em> underestimating me.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugo</title>
		<link>http://www.thinktoomuch.net/2007/10/26/woefully-inadequate/#comment-2255</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 15:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinktoomuch.net/2007/10/26/woefully-inadequate/#comment-2255</guid>
		<description>Hi cp... Thanks for stopping by...

Yes, wait for tomorrow&#039;s post. This one is addressed to a certain group of people, and includes references to things in those conversations.

I do suspect these two posts were rather too ranty/rambling. (At least, Steve thought so.) I think tomorrow&#039;s post is more standalone and independent of previous conversations and context. I&#039;m hoping it clears up a lot of things. (It cleared up things for myself. -&gt; I confuse myself as well... btw. ;) )

Given some more time and context, I&#039;m hoping you will have some idea of what I&#039;m on about. Or trying to be on about. At that point, please fire away with &lt;em&gt;any&lt;/em&gt; criticism you might have. I want to hear it. (Just keep in mind I am self-aware, and usually consciously and intentionally write the things that come across as crazy. I think, anyway.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi cp&#8230; Thanks for stopping by&#8230;</p>
<p>Yes, wait for tomorrow&#8217;s post. This one is addressed to a certain group of people, and includes references to things in those conversations.</p>
<p>I do suspect these two posts were rather too ranty/rambling. (At least, Steve thought so.) I think tomorrow&#8217;s post is more standalone and independent of previous conversations and context. I&#8217;m hoping it clears up a lot of things. (It cleared up things for myself. -> I confuse myself as well&#8230; btw. <img src='http://www.thinktoomuch.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  )</p>
<p>Given some more time and context, I&#8217;m hoping you will have some idea of what I&#8217;m on about. Or trying to be on about. At that point, please fire away with <em>any</em> criticism you might have. I want to hear it. (Just keep in mind I am self-aware, and usually consciously and intentionally write the things that come across as crazy. I think, anyway.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charl Botha</title>
		<link>http://www.thinktoomuch.net/2007/10/26/woefully-inadequate/#comment-2254</link>
		<dc:creator>Charl Botha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinktoomuch.net/2007/10/26/woefully-inadequate/#comment-2254</guid>
		<description>Hi there Hugo!  Is this one of those posts you can only understand if you were somewhere where I very definitely wasn&#039;t?  Should I wait for the post of tomorrow?

I&#039;ve done my best with your last two posts (including this one), but I&#039;m none the wiser. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there Hugo!  Is this one of those posts you can only understand if you were somewhere where I very definitely wasn&#8217;t?  Should I wait for the post of tomorrow?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve done my best with your last two posts (including this one), but I&#8217;m none the wiser. <img src='http://www.thinktoomuch.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugo</title>
		<link>http://www.thinktoomuch.net/2007/10/26/woefully-inadequate/#comment-2251</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 10:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinktoomuch.net/2007/10/26/woefully-inadequate/#comment-2251</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m also glad now, thanks! (Why now? Because it inspired tomorrow morning&#039;s post, to explain a number of things, and I love tomorrow mornings post much more than I hate this one. ;) )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m also glad now, thanks! (Why now? Because it inspired tomorrow morning&#8217;s post, to explain a number of things, and I love tomorrow mornings post much more than I hate this one. <img src='http://www.thinktoomuch.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PlatterFuss</title>
		<link>http://www.thinktoomuch.net/2007/10/26/woefully-inadequate/#comment-2250</link>
		<dc:creator>PlatterFuss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 10:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinktoomuch.net/2007/10/26/woefully-inadequate/#comment-2250</guid>
		<description>Hehe!  Glad you DID publish it!!!

Screwed?  Nah, Normal I would say!

:-P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hehe!  Glad you DID publish it!!!</p>
<p>Screwed?  Nah, Normal I would say!</p>
<p> <img src='http://www.thinktoomuch.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':-P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugo</title>
		<link>http://www.thinktoomuch.net/2007/10/26/woefully-inadequate/#comment-2247</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 06:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinktoomuch.net/2007/10/26/woefully-inadequate/#comment-2247</guid>
		<description>And I cannot believe I just published that. Let me think no more of it, and get on with my work. I&#039;m so screwed...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I cannot believe I just published that. Let me think no more of it, and get on with my work. I&#8217;m so screwed&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

