Today is Thanksgiving in America. From what I read, this holiday is also celebrated in a secular manner, though it has its roots in religious and cultural traditions.
I think this aspect of our traditions is beautiful and valuable. Similarly I have wondered about the benefits of the tradition of “saying grace” at every mealtime. It is a practice that could train our perspectives towards being more thankful of what we have in life, in contrast with having some “sense of entitlement” and being critical when things aren’t exactly the way you want them.
Permit me to quote the entire intro section of Wikipedia’s entry on Grace (prayer), because each paragraph had something useful in it, in the context of what I’m aiming for with this post: [Read more →]
Plum Village in France is a Buddhist meditation center. I stumbled over a post titled 51 Mental Formations which is simply a set of lists: “Universals”, “Particulars”, “Wholesome”, “Unwholesome” and “Indeterminate” mental formations. Being tagged with “trancription”, my guess is that it is material covered in a talk by Zen Master Thich Nhat Hanh?
What particularly caught my attention this evening, was that it lists “unbelief” and “lack of faith” as unwholesome – something heard regularly and strongly within fundamentalist Christian circles as well. What it provides, for me, is another example of the breadth of meaning of “faith”, and the meaning of “unbelief”, which is surely at odds with the fundamentalist Christian stereotype for those concepts.
I truly believe to fully appreciate the value and meaning of faith to humanity, and the reasons why “unbelief” references a concept that is harmful to a human, it is necessary to consider the greater diversity of human spirituality and the value it brings to our lives. And for context, I consider humanism to be relevant to this discussion, also a spiritual tradition of sorts.
I don’t have much to add at this point, I’m effectively saving the link for future reference. But simply to “go mediate” on the mental formations mentioned, I suspect, may already provide some insights.
On 23 September 2011, just over two years ago, I saw a bird on the ground in a hospital parking lot. It wasn’t moving. Much.
It was still breathing though. 16:05, the time of my first photo. I paused for a moment. Not sure what I was doing there, or what the point was; it was really just a coincidence that I was passing by at that time. But I paused, and stayed with the little bird for a minute or two. Its last minute or two. Very surreal, watching the little bird die. Its head slowly sagged lower and lower, until it gave a final convulsion or two and lay still, motionless.
Dale’s now writing a book on the “religious/non-religious mixed marriage”. What I love about his work is that it is positive. Anyway, he writes short daily journal entries while working on his books, the first for his new book points out the problem with our terms. Contrast:
Most people think of someone as religious if they believe in the existence of a God or gods. But many Unitarians, Buddhists, Humanistic Jews and others consider themselves religious even if they do not believe in God.
A slew of surveys show that millions of Americans believe in God but consider themselves nonreligious.
This example is about helping kids fight their Leukemia:
I’m hoping there aren’t people that try to argue that the general principle is a case of lying to children. Comic books are universally understood to be stories. Even when a child wears his Batman costume and says “I’m batman!” The stories provide a mirror for the children with which to understand their own lives. Perhaps some like to debate the presentation though?
I think that many children are now going to understand how this treatment can give them a magic power through this ‘Superformula’.
You can’t tell from this video how it is presented to the children though. If they are directly told that the formula provides “magic power” to make them better, would that be bad? I really don’t think so, but might there be “hard-liner rationalists” that would object to the use of the “magic” adjective?
It matters not what your worldview is, whether you be Christian or Muslim, Buddhist or “Tom Cruise, Scientologist”, whether you’re atheist, Hindu or Orthodox Jew… if you are living a meaningful life, you are living a story.
These stories of ours are not a matter of physics, not a case of chemical reactions, these stories are not a set of facts, a causal chain of events. Instead, they are fictions, narratives of human meaning, in human language, experiential, relational. These stories are what make us human. They are the things that turn life into a ride, rather than a mere condition of matter.
Scary how the years fly. The sixth anniversary of this blog passed a few days ago.
Consequence of the strain of thought-exhibitionism I exhibited especially in the early years, this blog serves as some interesting indirect documentation of a journey that has taken me on roads I did not anticipate. And some weeks before the blog’s sixth anniversary I felt I
arrived, yet again, at a destination that I felt I
had, in fact, briefly visited within its first year already.
In my experience, the belief that “everything happens for a reason” must be one of the most seductive memes making the rounds. I have bumped into this meme myself on two particular occasions during the years of this blog’s existence, and found the idea very enticing. So much so, that I’m thinking it might be worthwhile to intentionally sustain such a view, as far as possible and reasonable?
Would the Messiah be a Christian?
More interestingly, recognisable to Christians?
Bear in mind that Jesus was a Jew. Jewish canon had a very specific idea of what a messiah would be. Jesus did not live up to those expectations, so Jewish culture does not consider him to be the messiah. Orthodox Jewish culture still waits. One small sect splintered out of Judaism though: with a very simple statement of faith, “Jesus is Lord“, they recognised and acknowledged a counter-cultural non-messiah. The group grew dramatically and came to be known as Christians.
Now imagine a Christian second coming, not recognised by Christians…
I want to make one thing very clear: this post intends no insinuations whatsoever. There is nothing it is trying to argue, it merely seeks to encourage some rethinking of subconscious or institutionalised assumptions.
Just a quick post with a quote mining example. I’ve explained quote-mining before: it is when someone is quoted out of context, whereby their words are used to make them say something they didn’t actually say.
Often it is hard to know whether the person employing the misquote is wilfully dishonest or just woefully misinformed. In either case, to people that recognise what has happened, it doesn’t look all that different from this: